Skip to main content

One post tagged with "i18n"

View All Tags

Language gates belong in CI, not in code review folklore

· 6 min read
Sai Prudhvi Neelakantam
Senior Consultant, Data Engineering & AI at Evidi

Locale bugs and copy regressions show up in demos, not in polite Slack reminders. White-label shells make it worse: a forbidden customer string in core, a hard-coded English-only prompt overlay, a missing translation key that only fails in one market.

Put language gates in CI. Native linters in the pipeline beat optional pre-commit hooks for shared agent repos. Gates should cover prompt overlays and UI strings. Fail fast on forbidden customer hardcoding in core packages. Keep the gate list short enough that people do not bypass it. Locale and copy regressions are product bugs, not translation tickets filed after the fact.

Azure Pipelines overview

Figure 1. Locale and copy regressions are product bugs. Put the gates in CI where unwilling enforcement actually runs. Source: Microsoft Learn: what is Azure Pipelines.

Azure Pipelines task control options

Figure 2. Native linters and short language tests beat optional hooks that disappear under release pressure. Source: Microsoft Learn: pipeline tasks.